Did you watch tonight’s Tea Party debate? I sure did and let me tell you that no one puts on a more entertaining debate than those Tea Partiers. The only thing that could’ve made it better is if the Joker and Two-Face had interrupted the proceedings and taken Rick Perry’s toupée hostage.

Speaking of Perry, does anyone else think he and Mitt Romney should just get a room and fuck already? There’s some serious sexual tension between those two guys—they remind me of Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan arguing back and forth before they finally jumped into bed together in When Harry Met Sally. Besides, they’re conservatives so they can fuck each other and it wouldn’t mean that they’re gay so it’s all good.

But I’m not here to make fun of the Tea Party or discuss the bang-ability of Michelle Bachmann or whatever it is regular readers of this blog expect me to do. No, in fact, I think some very good points were made during the debate and I want to give props where props are due. And one of those great points came when moderator Wolf Blitzer (who’s aptly looking more and more wolf-like every day) asked Ron Paul a hypothetical question about a 30-year-old uninsured man who becomes seriously ill and couldn’t pay his medical bills. “Are you saying society should just let him die?” Wolf howled asked.

Now, Paul didn’t directly come out and say yes, instead giving some reply about the individual’s freedom of choice and something about the church, but there were audible responses of “Yeah” and “let him die” as well as applause from the audience.

Some “liberals” folks were outraged at this response and argue that it’s an example of just how out-of-touch and crazy these Tea Party people are, but I’m going to side with the crazy Tea Partiers on this one.

Let’s be pragmatic, if the guy would’ve died in six months without the proper medical treatment, it means he’s really, really sick. So even with proper medical treatment, he probably wouldn’t have lived too much longer anyway. So why prolong his agony and pain? And why waste good money that could go toward more useful things like buying votes in Florida in the 2012 election? Hell, if he’s sick and won’t survive without a “handout” (i.e. insurance), we should just execute him “humanely”. Isn’t that the Christian thing to do?

Besides, if he’s 30 and already has some life-threatening disease, it probably means God hates him and is punishing him for some grave sin. He probably did something bad like steal or fornicate outside of marriage or vote for Obama.

But I think the Tea Partiers can take it even further. The Tea Party is always talking about how wasteful government is. Well, once these sick, uninsured people die (or are executed)–instead of tossing out their lifeless bodies, which would be wasteful, they should instead be converted into foodstuffs. I mean how else are the Tea Partiers going to feed all those aborted babies they’re going to un-abort and save? And this would be a great source of protein for Perry and Romney who’ll need to boost their energy after fucking each other so vigorously. Besides, I hear cancer cells really give the flavor of human meat a kick.

So God bless the Tea Party and God bless America!